Concept Of Collaborative Working Social Work Essay

Concept Of collaborative constituteing loving Work Essay genial Work is at an most-valuable stage in its development as a transaction not only in the United Kingdom merely somewhat the world. All professions must be responsive and proactive to changing kind and economic climates and conditions if they are to meet the conducts of the hoi polloi they are serving.It is infixed for mixer Workers to be equal to practise in accordance with neighborly work values and to retain a expel lord identity, and at the same time to be able to work effectively with different professional person groups and agencies.Although there are m either a(prenominal) terms used to appoint on the job(p) together with different professions ofttimes(prenominal) as joint work, inter-professional workingss, multi-disciplinary working and inter-agency working the term currently used by the Department of easilyness publications is collaborative practice (Whittington 2003b). New ways of worki ng that crossed professional boundaries had to be created, in cast to in allow a more pliable approach to flush delivery (Malin et al, 2002).Collaboration in health and affable supervise is a relatively new field of study, with the first study studies being undertaken in the 1980s (Roy, 2001). In health and social care collaborative working is often referred to as Inter-professional working, as it is not save active professionals working together. The patients, clients or answer exploiters are a substitution part of the team.At its simplest the concept of collaboration infers that people from different professional and academic backgrounds piddle a working relationship for the purpose of deepen service provision. However, the exact nature of the federation is likely to be contested, whilst to the full integrated joined-up collaborative practice has so far proved elusive. hard-hitting dialogue is an essential component of the traditional social work roles and respons ibilities. It is because equally necessary for social workers to similarly have effective talk skills if they are to promote self-help and potency to those whom they are providing a service for.Lishman (1994) reminds us that care managers and providers get out have to use a range of intercourse and interpersonal skills if community care is really to mean care, choice and empowerment of others. collaborative working implies conscious fundamental interaction amidst the parties to achieve a common goal (Meads Ashcroft, 2005). It recognises both difference similarity.Collaboration is a form by which members of different disciplines administer their skills and expertise to provide a smash quality service to patients, clients or service users (Hughes, Hemingway Smith, 2005). The sharing of information office both getting information and giving it. The act of gaining information in Social Work is an essential task the information gained washbowl be used for numerous purposes such asMaking an assessment of need or riskWriting a reportPlanning an preventativeTo beneficialify obtaining resourceThe something or benefit is sometimes called collaborative advantage, and it can be seen as the fuel of collaborative working the greater the capableness or actual advantage gained by all parties, the greater the levels of talent fuelling the collaboration.According to Wilson (2008) and Hughes, Hemmingway Smith (2005) inter-professional and collaborative working means considering the service user in a holistic way, and it benefits the service user when different organisations, such as Social Workers, Di unrelenting Nurses, Occupational Therapists and other health professionals spot together to provide a better service. These definitions describe collaborative working as the act of people working together toward common goals. combine working involves putting the service user at the center of closing making to meet their needs and improve their lives (Dept. Health, 2009).Effective collaboration and interaction will have positive outcomes within a working surroundings for both the teams working together and the service user. Agencies should be encouraged to share information to ensure that all needs of the service users are met but also to ensure the safety of the service user and the other teams involved. affectionateness for People (Dept. Health, 1989) verbalize that successful collaboration required a clear, plebeian understanding by every agency of each others responsibilities and powers, in order to seduce plain how and with whom collaboration should be secured.The governing has been promoting inter-agency and collaborative working since the late 80s which also saw a change in the policies set(p) forth by the governments and a legislative backdrop was created to promote self-collaboration between companies. The stated aim has been to create high quality, needs-led, co-ordinated services that maximised choice for the service u ser. (Payne, 1995). Recent events and media outcries have focused collaborative working solely on Social Work as stated in Pollard, Sellman Senior (2005) and when viewed as a good thing, it is worthwhile to critically examine its benefits and drawbacks. (Leathard, 2003).The old government set forth architectural plans to modernize the Social Services as well as update the NHS. A clear indication of this can be found in NHS Plan (Dept. Health, 2000) and Modernizing the Social Services (Dept. Health, 1998a). This was not in fact a new plan it was part of a suppuration emphasis stemming from the 1970s. The death of Maria Coldwell in 1974 meant there were questions asked why professionals were not able to protect children who they had identified as most at risk.The Cleveland examination 1988 resulted in the direct opposite of 1974 when the methods of the Social Services were deemed too strict and over powering, it was deemed that children were removed from their families when there was myopic concrete evidence of rail at or abuse (Butler-Sloss, 1988), with too much emphasis put on the medical opinion.The old government set forth plans to modernize the Social Services as well as update the NHS. A clear indication of this can be found in NHS Plan (Dept. Health, 2000) and Modernizing the Social Services (Dept. Health, 1998a). This was not in fact a new plan it was part of a growing emphasis stemming from the 1970s. The death of Maria Coldwell in 1974 meant there were questions asked why professionals were not able to protect children who they had identified as most at risk.The Cleveland Inquiry 1988 resulted in the direct opposite of 1974 when the methods of the Social Services were deemed too strict and over powering, it was deemed that children were removed from their families when there was little concrete evidence of harm or abuse (Butler-Sloss, 1988), with too much emphasis put on the medical opinion.The Munro Report (2010) stated that other service agenci es cannot and should not replace Social Workers, but there is a requirement for agencies to engage professionally about children, young people and families on their caseloads.The Childrens Act 2004 was introduced after the public inquiry into the death of capital of Seychelles Climbi in 2000 the same public inquiry also resulted in the every Child Matters movement. The failure to collaborate effectively was highlighted as one of many missed opportunities by the inquiry into the tragic death of Victoria Climbi (Laming, 2003) and sister Peter (Munro, 2010).Expressing what you all want to achieve in clear, outcomes-oriented language, and being able to continually recheck those outcomes as your work together proceeds, is the single most important key to successful collaboration. However, it is actually quite difficult to express outcomes in ways that are unambiguous and clearly understood by all of the potential or actual collaborators.The quality of communication is vital. Poor commun ication is often behind many of the disputes that threaten to stall collaborative working relationships. Clear lines of communication need to be established across the institutions that make up a consortium to ensure everyone is aware of and is able to go for out the accepted policies and procedures. Accountabilities, in particular, should be well defined.Participation and interlocking of service user is also critical in the Social Work field. This after all is the main beneficiary of the collaborative working avoidance and your goal as a Social Worker is to meet their needs and goals. If you show the service user respect they too will bind you a interchangeable respect which will allow the Social Workers and other elements of the collaborative team to achieve their common goals.However beneficiaries do not have to be aware that an activity is being delivered in partnership for the partnership to be successful. Regular reviews and users feedback can help measure its impact.Coll aborative advantage will be achieved when something unusually creative is produced perhaps an accusatory is met that no organisation could have produced on its own and when each organisation, finished collaboration, is able to achieve its own objectives better than it could alone. (Huxham, 1996).Huxham was showing that collaboration will work when it is done properly, and when we as Social Workers put aside any prejudices that are under lying in our working mentality and also our personal mentality, we will work well with other fields and practices to form a more efficient and organised service.By learning with, from and about one another practitioners can understand respective roles and responsibilities, generate mutual trust, strengthen relationships and improve collaborative practice (Barr et al 2005). To summarise and shut down the development of collaborative working will undoubtedly require a change in culture and values amongst health and social care professionals howeve r it is working and developing quickly and for the better of not just the collaborating agencies but also for the service users.