Bill Clinton :: Essays Papers

Bill Clinton Conceived on Aug. 19, 1946, in Hope, Ark., William (Bill) Jefferson Blythe IV experienced childhood in a grieved home. His dad had kicked the bucket in a car crash three months before his child's introduction to the world, and his mom later had to leave her two-year-old child with his grandparents when she moved to New Orleans to seek after her nursing examines. The family settled in Hot Springs, Ark., after his mom wedded Roger Clinton, whose last name Bill later embraced. As a youngster, Bill was resolved to succeed and habitually earned scholastic distinctions, including determination as an agent to the American Legion Boy's Nation program in Washington, D.C., where the 16-year-old Clinton met Pres. John F. Kennedy and resolved to leave on a political vocation. Going to Georgetown University to consider global issues, Clinton filled in as an assistant for Sen. J. William Fulbright of Arkansas before accepting his B.S. degree in 1968. In the wake of winning a Rhodes grant to Oxford University, Clinton came back to the United States to select at Yale Law School. In 1972 he assisted with overseeing presidential applicant George McGovern's Texas battle. In the wake of moving on from graduate school in 1973, Clinton came back to Arkansas to instruct and to design his political profession. On Oct. 11, 1975, he wedded Hillary Rodham, a kindred law understudy he had met at Yale. Following 12 years of Republican control of the administration, Clinton came to office in the midst of exclusive requirements for basic approach change. Right off the bat in his organization he turned around various Republican strategies. He finished the bureaucratic denial on the utilization of fetal tissue for clinical examination, revoked rules confining fetus removal guiding in governmentally subsidized wellbeing centers, and utilized his arrangement capacity to satisfy a guarantee to put numerous ladies and minorities in noticeable government positions. Albeit supported by a Congress constrained by the Democratic party, Clinton thought that it was hard to change the course of national needs during his initial two years in office. Right off the bat in his organization a few of his nominees experienced congressional dissatisfaction. His proposition to end the restriction on gay people in the military met with across the board resistance from Congress, the military, and the general population and must be changed generously. Clinton had vowed to invert the Bush strategy of returning Haitian displaced people to their country, however he in the end chose to keep executing his antecedent's arrangement. The inability to order extensive human services change end up being a significant mishap for Clinton.

Life of Pi Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Life of Pi - Research Paper Example Life of Pi is a 2012 American - Indian-British real to life and PC energized experience show film dependent on Yann Martel’s 2001 novel of a similar name. Ang Lee coordinates the film. Life of Pi succeeded in delineating the tale of a youthful Indian man who endures the awful wreck yet later entered a 227 days venture on the Pacific Ocean with a savage Belgian tiger. Other than the difficulties and tribulation, the film additionally delineates significant exercises on the strict viewpoints. Pi Patel whose job was played by Gautam Belur at five, Ayush at twelve, Suraj Sharma at 16 and Irran Khan at middle age needed to move all together to Canada on a Japanese load transport. Sadly, the boat where they were going in is struck by a lethal tempest and just a few people endure. Notwithstanding, a startling occurrence occurs, isolating Pi from the gathering. Pi is disregarded in the pontoon along with his family’s zoo creatures, remembering for the zoo creatures is a brutal tiger named Richard parker. So as to endure Pi needs to discover approaches to manage the surprising and hazardous organization. (John, 186). All through the 127 minutes of the film, the crowd would be interested with pi contemplations and activities through the changes, the convictions he holds just as his answers for the fearsome, forceful organization Richard Parker. From an in some way or another feeble, flabby individual, Pi is seen letting parker assume control over the raft, however Pi step by step gets more grounded and attempts to pick up predominance of the circumstance that he is in now. At last, Pi accomplishes the control and continues an unbiased relationship with the Belgian tiger. This isn't just a battle for endurance yet in addition a representation, which infers the fight for good and fiendishness. The film Pi attempts to make the peruser need to have confidence in God, the film give then peruser the law based decision that is the ideal to accept instead of the co nviction itself. The two get by for 272 days adrift with one stop on an island flooding with vegetation and meerkats. In the nighttimes when the tide ascends on the island, it contains a savage acidic level and kills anything in the tide pool or the now overwhelmed ground. In this way, everybody looks for cover on the trees around evening time. In the wake of social event food from the island, Pi and the tiger return to the raft and head back in the ocean (Susan, 23). By examining the contentions, characters, dream grouping, and images a psychoanalytic hypothesis develops. There are solid Oedipal implications in this hypothesis, the son’s want for his mom, the father’s jealousy of the child and contention for the moms consideration, the little girls want for the father’s consideration. Of cource these all work on an inner mind level of the characters of the film, this is to keep away from the genuine social more. There is additionally an accentuation on the impo rtance of dreams. This is on the grounds that psychoanalytic hypothesis affirms that it is in dreams that a person’s subliminal wants are uncovered. What an individual can't communicate or do as a result of social guidelines will be communicated and achieved in dreams, where there are no social standards. More often than not, individuals are not even mindful that it is they covertly want until their psyche goes unchecked in rest. Life of Pi probably won't cause you to put stock in god, as a character in the film proposes. It does be that as it may; make you

Supply Stationary For A Period Three Years †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Talk About The Supply Stationary For A Period Three Years? Answer: Introducation Segment 1324 of the Corporation Act 2001 gives that the court can give an order against a move which has made spot in negation of the CA by the executives of the organization. Moreover the court may give harms to the individual who has made application for such request alongside or in replacement of the infusion request. On account of Phoenix Constructions Queensland Pty Ltd v Coastline Constructions Pty Ltd and McCracken [2011] QSC 167 the court needed to decide the utilization of segment 1324 of the CA which in rundown expresses that an executive of official might be forced with an order on the off chance that it is discovered that they have connected with or are intending to participate in a movement which is against the arrangements of the organization demonstration. For this situation it was given by the court that s182 of the CA had been penetrated by the chief by utilizing his situation in the organization to bring disadvantage for the organization and addition individual favorable position as the executive didn't permit to cause the organization to get a specific property under a joint endeavor for making advantage his significant other. As indicated by segment 140 of the CA if an organization has a constitution or replaceable guidelines which are viable on such organization they have an impact of an agreement between every individual from the organization and the organization itself, between each executive and friends secretary of the organization and the organization itself, the individuals from the organization with different individuals through which each individual is has a consent to play out the standards and constitution to the extent relevant on the individual. On account of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association [1915] 1 Ch 881 it was decided by the court that the individuals reserve the option to constrain the organization to maintain its constitution. As per segment 232 of the CA the court has the option to make a request according to segment 233 of the CA in the event that it is discovered that the issues of the organization comparable to a proposed or genuine oversight or act corresponding to the organization or a proposed or taken goals by individuals, on the off chance that they are not advantageous for the individuals from the organization or unjustifiably biased to, severe to, or unreasonably prejudicial against individuals or any part in the limit. According to area 233 of the CA the court may make a request against the organization to be ended up, revoking or adjustment to the current constitution of the organization, controlling the future issues of the organization, denying an individual from doing a direct or a demonstration or to cause an individual to do or submit a specific demonstration. On account of Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 the court established that they can take a wide view according to area 233 and 232 of the CA. Application In the given conditions Peter is an individual from Sparkles Ltd holding 5% of the offers in the organization. He has a privilege with the organization for a long time as per which he is to flexibly fixed to the organization. As gave by segment 140 of the CA if an organization has a constitution or replaceable guidelines which are powerful on such organization they have an impact of an agreement between the individual from the organization and the organization itself concerning the standards of such constitution. Hence it tends to be given that diminish is in an agreement with Sparkles Ltd to flexibly them fixed for a time of three years. Anyway such agreements have been abused by the executives of the organization. Thusly according to the guidelines of area 1324 of the CA, subside can make a case for directive against the organization as it has damaged segment 140 of the CA. He would not exclusively be qualified for an order to give limit the agreement being provide for Office Pax L td yet additionally remuneration for any misfortune endured by him. Likewise he has the option to make a case for severe cure under segment 232 of the CA as the executives of the organization are enjoying activity which isn't gainful for the enthusiasm of the organization. This is on the grounds that they are selling the advantages of the organization for an underestimate or intending to do so which is a break of segment 233 of the CA. End Along these lines Peter can guarantee cure of forestalling further infringement of the segment and remuneration for the misfortune caused by the organization under segment 232 and 233 of the CA and a directive under area 1324 of the CA. References Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 Enterprise Act 2001 (Cth) Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association [1915] 1 Ch 881 Phoenix Constructions Queensland Pty Ltd v Coastline Constructions Pty Ltd and McCracken [2011] QSC 167

Great Barrier Reef Essay -- Wonders of the World, Australia

The Great Barrier Reef is known as one of the Seven Wonders of the World. It is accepted to be one of the most mind boggling places on this planet. This reef is the biggest living creature on earth and the main living thing on earth noticeable from space (2011). The warm waters of the southwest Pacific Ocean are the ideal conditions to make the world's biggest arrangement of coral reefs. The Great Barrier Reef is in such flawless condition that it was recorded by the World Heritage Trust as a secured site and is in this manner, oversaw by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to guarantee that its excellence is kept up for some voyagers and tourists (Edgar 2010). Because of the multifaceted nature of this regular marvel, human practices have prompted environmental issues for the reef, yet conservation endeavors can give people in the future the capacity to gain from and experience one of the biggest maritime coral biological systems on the planet. The Great Barrier Reef is found simply off the bank of Australia. This marine park extends more than 1800 miles and is practically corresponding to the Queensland coast (2011). The reef traverses a separation of 65 km wide and arrives at 15 to 150 km seaward (2011). At only 500,000 years of age, the Great Barrier Reef is a moderately youthful structure. However considerably more youthful is the present reef's structure at under 8,000 years of age (Edgar 2010). The development of the Great Barrier Reef is extremely unpredictable. Coral reefs started to shape in the district at around 58 to 48 million years prior when the Coral Sea Basin framed (Briney 2010). Notwithstanding, when the Australian mainland moved to its current area, ocean levels started to change, and coral reefs began to develop decently fast, changing atmosphere and ocean levels. This therefore made them... ...populaces, a few nations have put into fish cultivating or aquaculture, however some debate has followed from this training. Studies have demonstrated that fish ranches are not useful in continuing the local fish, and have really hurt them. There are two fundamental kinds of aquaculture: inland and seaward. These homesteads, in many cases due to packed tanks, bring about flare-ups of savage illnesses. A model is pop eye, an eye contamination that causes growing of the eye. On seaward ranches, trained fish regularly escape through defective and substandard netting, tainting local fish populaces. On the other hand, seaward homesteads represent an alternate issue. The board of these offices has been known to channel unadulterated overabundance squander results of the fish into the sea. The polluted water, likewise loaded with supplements, makes green growth blossoms and keeps ocean bottom from daylight.

This play is really a piece of veiled social criticism, its theme on the failure of the American dream Essay Example for Free

This play is actually a bit of hidden social analysis, its subject on the disappointment of the American dream Essay In the American dream, America is depicted as the place where there is new chances at life; the ideal spot for everybody to live, all the cliché Americans are enormous, agreeable, rich, and inside and out glad. They depict the picture that through difficult work, trustworthiness and legitimacy, they also can arrive at the top, have an enormous house, loads of cash and the ideal all American family, a caring upbeat spouse and two cunning youngsters. The play, nonetheless, could be Albees endeavor to show that much of the time this American dream is unachievable and, what could show up from the outset to be the ideal family could, on closer assessment, end up being something not affirming to the American dream at all. This could likewise be Albee indicating that the American dream is an ideal picture, and only a picture. From the outset sight, Martha and George have all the earmarks of being as distant from the American dream and its beliefs as is conceivable. They are continually rejecting with one another and quarreling and appear not to have a decent word to state to the next. At a certain point Martha cites You see, George didnt have muchpushhe wasnt especially forceful. Truth be told, he was a kind of aa FLOP! A greatbigfatflop! Martha is depicting her better half undoubtedly to his associates. This empowers us feel that no couple from the American dream situation would accomplish something like this. She is obtrusively double-crossing her better half, and all the more critically, wrecking the upbeat family component of the American dream. As the play draws on, in any case, we discover increasingly more proof of a glad marriage, concealed behind a thickened outside from long periods of practicing their brains. We can discover a few instances of their adoration; the first being in the parlor soon after the weapon episode when Martha requests that George kiss her to exhibit his fondness. The second somewhat progressively muddled issue, when she leaves with Nick and, in spite of no conspicuous indications of protest George truly wishes she would rethink the thought. Toward the start, Nick and Honey appear as though the ideal all-American couple-youthful, appealing, on their approach to progress. Scratches appeal is depicted in the initial exchange among George and Martha, as she portrays Nick and George recalls that him as the gorgeous one. As the play advances, an alternate couple develops. Scratch uncovers himself to be cutthroat and somewhat heartless; prepared to take the necessary steps to get to the top. Nectar appears to be senseless and miserably illogical until she uncovers herself to be profoundly startled of the real world, an interminable kid who will not grow up to the obligations of life (as spoke to by labor). Scratch appreciates George and Marthas mystery, however whether he is changed by it is an inquiry the play doesnt answer. As Martha is depicting her child, Honey shouts out that she needs a kid, yet Honeys future is vague, as well. Regardless of whether she will feel a similar route after she has calmed down is never explain ed. Scratch gives off an impression of being the ideal contender for the American dream. He is attractive, fruitful in his activity, has the ideal all American spouse, and a decent point of view. As the plot advances we begin to see a more extensive point of view on Nicks life. He isn't straightforward and we can see this in the center scene when he is happy to assist his profession by laying down with the principals little girl. This demonstration isn't deserving of any legitimacy and he appears to not lament doing it either, certainly not a nature of the American dream legend. His better half likewise doesnt show up focused on his activity as she extraordinarily resented making companions and associates at Nicks past post. She even ventured to groan about this to her spouses associates, notwithstanding the way that these were acceptable and genuine, merit-commendable approaches to help her better half in arriving at the top. Martha is an enormous caught up with bodying lady who is very shaky. She shows a requirement for affection, which can without much of a stretch lead to her getting injured. In the earliest reference point she approaches George for a kiss. At the point when he denies she appears to wouldn't fret yet we can feel gigantic influxes of upset originating from underneath the surface. We accept that she feels her marriage is uncertain and that since she cannot cherish herself she cannot comprehend why George can adore her. We see her, as uproarious clamorous and bossy however would she say she is truly? Her thick external shell could just be her method of forestalling herself getting injured, or it could be all the more basically, that she utilizes the consideration she gets from the kidding as a substitute for the love that she never got as a youngster. Her authority over George is seen directly from the earliest starting point, she is very over possessive of their marriage but then now and again she shows up as though she couldnt care less. Though the various characters have an unequivocal character, which turns out to be increasingly characterized all through the play, Marthas character changes continuously. From the outset she appreciates making jokes about everybody, at that point she doesnt and afterward she just falls. We see this as either Albee continually adjusting her character to the changing occasions in the play or his method of making this character truly wake up in a spot consistent with our souls; where we would all be able to relate to her. George is the normal middle age school teacher, wedded, cliché, yet not the American dream man. He is lousy in his vocation and his significant other rushes to call attention to this. He has not fit in with Marthas plans for him to turn into a high standing man in the college, assuming control over the office and in the end the school. In spite of his evident disappointment in his work he is a man who has certain standards and sticks with them. He doesnt anyway item to Marthas infidelity, he trusts that even down to the last possible moment, she will alter her perspective and not just keep pushing to perceive how far she can go before George will protest. We would all be able to see in any case, that George is exceptionally pitiful when Martha has pushed past the final turning point and won't adjust her perspective; he truly adores her. Toward the finish of the play he likewise ends up pushing things excessively far, yet this doesn't have any kind of effect to our considerations that he is more satisfying of the American dream than Martha, Honey or Nick. Nectar is an exceptionally whimsical character; she essentially does what goes for whatever she might prefer best. In the primary section of the play she admits to George that she doesnt truly need kids and, without disclosing to her better half is having mystery premature births. This is coldblooded and mean. It could bring their marriage colliding with the ground, and could likewise significantly annoyed Nick when he discovers. She knows about this yet proceeds with the premature births in any case. Does this, the crowd ask, make her a coldblooded character? The appropriate response is no, she knows about the way that Nick wedded her for her cash and not love so she subsequently isn't 100% cautious about her marriage. She drinks herself senseless toward the finish of the principal scene and afterward continues to keep drinking. An American dream character would have halted before now, except if she is drinking to shroud her distresses or fears. In the play, the crowd knows that both Martha and Honey have social issues. Nectar drinks a great deal to cover, and avoid her issues and Martha puts on an external appearance of being uproarious and disorderly, regardless of the reality she isnt. Albee has given both of these characters overbearing dads who don't comply with the American dream. The two men went through their years getting rich, not by difficult work, however by taking from the spots they worked for, as should be obvious in these two concentrates, the first from George on Marthas father; Martha has cash as well. That is to say, her dads been ransacking this spot daze for a considerable length of time, and the second from Nick, He spent Gods moneyand he spared his own, Neither of the dads invested a lot of energy at home either, and disregarded their little girls, utilizing their taken cash as a substitute for adoration and warmth. This insufficiency in their youth drives us, the crowd to think about whether perhaps t hese previous issues are some reason for the difficulties the two of them surrender to in their own relationships. All the men in Albees play appear to have bombed the American dream as far as employment beliefs. None of them have an occupation where they have prevailing through trustworthiness and reliability. George is the one in particular who has been steadfast, fair and dedicated, and he is as yet stuck in the mud at the base, in Marthas words, a failure. We don't discover how Marthas father got to the top; regardless of whether fair or not. We do hear, anyway that he takes cash from the college and has fizzled Martha as a dad, leaving us in no uncertainty with regards to what kind of individual he is. Scratch has fizzled at a past activity and has gone to another college wanting to make a fresh start, this likely could be accepted in the event that he didnt proceed to lay down with the principals little girl soon after showing up. He additionally clarifies, before laying down with her to George that she is the most significant lady in the college, the greatest goose in the gaggle, persuading that possibly hes laying down with her only for the force. Nectars father is involved by his child in-law to torch houses of worship to get cash; not the kind of conduct for a man of the American dream. Gamesmanship is one of the plays significant subjects and is communicated in the title of the primary demonstration, Fun and Games. Albee is accentuating the games everybody plays throughout everyday life, especially those that are unsafe to us and to other people. George and Marthas games have moved past the requirements of an ordinary couple to scold each other for their deficiencies. They presently are equipped for injuring each other profoundly, as these games have gotten a substitute for genuine correspondence between them. In the play, their need to lash out reaches out to incorporate Nick and Honey; and the gathering games, including Humiliate the Host, Get the Guests, Bringing Up Baby, and so on, give the structure to their conjugal fights. Georges choice to murder his and Marthas child gives the climactic game that may change their lives until the end of time. Nectar and Nick have no kids, in spite of showing up, from the start, to need a kid. As we get inside this

Children Arts (Importance of Scribling) Essay Example For Students

Youngsters Arts (Importance of Scribling) Essay Individuals dont understand the significance jotting has on a childs improvement and creative mind. Scrawls are the structure squares of workmanship. Rhoda Kellogg brought up that from the start scrawls may appear as though tangles Of spaghetti, lines with out structure or differentiation. As a matter of fact, there are numerous kinds of scrawls. There are twenty essential sorts Of scrawls made up Of lines that are vertical, level, corner to corner, round, bending, and waving. A ton of scrawls likewise incorporate dabs. As indicated by Scott ODell and Rwanda one of the scrawls youngsters like best ranges over the paper freely on an askew hub, leaving two corners unfilled. Its difficult for individuals to see anything extraordinary in the jotting yet to the youngster it his something that only they made, something that didn't exist to the world a brief time prior. Writing is so unconstrained, it simply occurs, and each line makes the establishment for workmanship. At the point when the youngster gets more established they will figure out how writing makes hair for individuals, leaves for trees, and mists for the sky. By the age oftener youngsters find out about creation shapes. These examples are fundamental, and are rarely overlooked. Very quickly in the wake of figuring out how to draw shapes, kids start to join shapes making structures. At four years old and five kids start to draw the human figure and creatures. Ay the age of six a youngster draws one individual or numerous individuals, one house or numerous houses, yet they are still plans. Not until he is seven does the photos start to recount to their own story. At the point grown-ups can relate better with the childs imagination. While these phases Of advancement are going on we need to ensure as teachers and guardians we support the childrens supposition on what is craftsmanship. Its genuine imperative to energize the development in craftsmanship additionally we should let there creative mind go crazy and not make limits. In the event that we make limits for youngsters on craftsmanship they wont grow completely in light of the fact that in there mind they will give us precisely what we expect and not figure out how to explore. As indicated by Rwanda Kellogg and Scott ODell kids who are disregarded to draw what they like build up a store of information which empowers them to reach there conclusive phase of self trained, From that point they may form into skilled specialists. Be that as it may, most youngsters lose enthusiasm for drawing after the initial not many years since they are not allowed to grow uninhibitedly. Instructors that compel kids to draw genuine world class objects are not being useful; they cause the kid to lose certainty and pride in there innovativeness. So I discovered that letting the kid investigate there own brain of craftsmanship will permit them o be as well as can be expected be. So my recommendation to instructors and guardians is to let the children teach them in craftsmanship since we may take in some things from kids. I gained as a matter of fact confidence working with kids that they may amaze you with what they think of. A significant number of my past understudies indicated that they love the days we did free draw more than the things we made arrangements for them like creation manikins.

What Hell or High Water Tells Us About Power, Economics, and Life - Literature Essay Samples

In David Mckenzie’s Hell or High Water, we are introduced to brothers Toby and Tanner Howard (played by Chris Pine and Ben Foster, respectively). They have been poor their whole lives and are at risk of losing a piece of property to the bank which is later revealed to have a fair amount of oil on it. To pay of their debts (thereby stopping the bank from taking the property), and to stop the vicious cycle of poverty in their family, the dynamic duo have started to rob Texas Midlands Bank branches – the same bank that preyed on both their financial and moral vulnerability. To pay off what the film portrays as a predatory bank loan, the boys need to raise approximately $40,000. To make a long story short, after a lengthy series of trial and tribulations, the boys succeed in raising the money and securing the financial future of their family. Along the way, though, we watch a number of encounters that help to illuminate two of the films many themes: how technology has chang ed the way people make a living and the terrible effect poverty and a lack of opportunity has a people. There is scene in Hell or High Water that has stuck with me since I first saw it in 2016. It’s a scene in the middle of the film which shows Texas Ranger Marcus Hamilton (played by Jeff Bridges, who garnered a nomination for Best Supporting Actor at that year’s Academy Awards) and his partner Alberto (played by Gil Birmingham) driving down a highway, trying to get to the scene of one in a string of bank robberies they are investigating. Like they do for much of the film, the two are bickering and trading insults with each other Until they spot a fire and a cowboy moving his cattle out of its path. They stop and ask the cowboy – incidentally played by the film’s writer, Taylor Sheridan – if he needs any help. He politely declines and tells the Rangers he should just give up and let the fire â€Å"turn [him] to ashes to put [him] out of [his] misery† and that â€Å"It’s the 21st century and I’m racing a fire to the river with a h erd of cattle. No wonder why my kids won’t do this [expletive] for a living.† Alberto asks if they should call the fire in; Marcus says that they shouldn’t as it would just burn out anyway. Nevertheless, Marcus remarks that â€Å"there’s no one to call out here anyway.† Not only is this scene an ode to a dying way of life, it helps to illuminate how technology has changed the way people make a living. For the better part of four or five centuries, many people made a living herding cattle in the manner shown in the film. No longer. It is dying it because it no longer has the same appeal in the modern world. Quite simply, it doesn’t provide the same stability it did in the past when it was the most productive way to use the land and earn a respectable livelihood. Modern technology has made it much easier to throw a bunch of cattle in a cage and pump them up with antibiotics and feed them with unhealthy grains than to raise them in nature, keeping a close eye on them at all times. In truth, raising cattle’s in the way pictured in the film is inefficient but it also gave so many people jobs (and made better cattle too); raising them the way moder n farms is certainly more efficient, but it creates inferior cattle and employs so few people. Predatory banks and a lack of well-paying jobs has also led to a terrible, vicious, and never-ending cycle of poverty. Early on in the film, it’s clear that Tanner, Toby, and their family have been affected deeply by predatory bank loans. After all, they owe approximately $40,000 and have very little money to their name. But it’s also the people around them that have been deeply affected by predatory banks and a lack of well-paying jobs. This is clear when the Rangers come to question some townsfolk about the robberies that had taken place and they all refuse to give up Toby and Tanner – even though they clearly saw them. They realize how hurtful the banks have been to so many and are okay with seeing them lose a bit money – money that, in the end, will be inconsequential to the banks. In that same scene, when the boys are eating at a diner, we are introduced to a waitress who can’t afford to pay her mortgage because she doesn’t make enough a t her serving job – one of the only jobs around, she says. The $200 tip that Toby give her will ensure she and her child have a roof under their heads. Otherwise, they may go homeless because there aren’t enough jobs for her to work. This also probably means that she has had to take out loans to survive; loans taken from the banks in a time of need and ultimately, desperation, condemning her, and ultimately her child, to a life of poverty. Although Tanner and Toby have taken things into their owns hands to end this cycle of poverty for them and their children, many around them will not and will be stuck poor for most – if not all – of their lives. Not only does Hell or High Water illuminate how technology has changed the way people make their livelihood and how banks prey on those seeking more opportunity to get and stay out of poverty, it’s call to action is much more powerful: if you want to change your circumstances, pull yourself up by your bootstraps and do it yourself – don’t rely on anyone else to do it for you.